Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Authentic Wine - Question of the Day 01/04/2012

A couple of days ago I posted the article about  Jamie Goode and Sam Harrop MW's book "Authentic Wine"

This is such a fascinating topic to me that I decided to start asking questions to grab as many opinions as I can. I'll try to post daily... but let's see how it goes...
Here is my question for today: 
With which one of these two quotes would you agree more?
"Before a wine is good, it must be true" Nicolas Joly
or
"The first obligation of a wine is to be good" Peter Lanberg

Cheers,
LA


Previous related articles:

Authentic Wine - Question of the Day 01/02/2012 

Authentic Wine - Question of the Day 01/03/2012

If you haven't bought your copy yet: 

http://www.thewinehub.com/ 
One of the pillars of TheWineHub is Wine Tourism. Whether you are a wine maker, or a wine drinker, we all enjoy having discoveries...
TheWineHub exists to help you with that.

5 comments:

Maria Valetta said...

My thoughts is to agree with Quote number one. A wine must be true to it's identity: in grape variety, in terroir expression, and true in quality and winemaking techniques, meaning that it is made in the utmost standard and using the truest and most honest practices in winemaking. Some wines can be good, but aren't necessarily "true", meaning they may taste good but have not been made using a method that represents the grape in it's truest and most terroir specific form.

PHILIP.KAMPE@TheWineHub.com said...

What is the definition of GOOD?
And who can define TRUE in wine?

I DON'T agree with either ststement.

beato iberico said...

I find some kind of ambiguity in this choice, depending on how you read Lanberg's statement: does "The first obligation of a wine is to be good" mean "good by every means", even illegal or unsustainable or unnatural? Then surely I would go for the first quote. If instead, as I think, Lanberg's good includes and somehow postulates Joly's true, then the two statements are everything but incompatible.

Scott Clemens said...

I agree with the second quote. While we may appreciate wines that reveal their origins, what good is it if a wine is true to its variety(ies) and terroir and is yet truly dreadful?

Luiz Alberto, #winelover said...

Phil, the answers to your questions:

Good = A wine that is not faulty

True = Joly believes that a “true wine” is the result of the work of nature where the winemaker respects the nuances and characteristics of the soils and climate.

40 Years of Winemaking at Russian River Valleys Sonoma-Cutrer by Philip S. Kampe

 Innovation in Winemaking at Sonoma-Cutrer began forty years ago. The focus has always been innovation for this Russian River Valley winery....